Development Matters

Articles

Case3-March-2014

Social Seed Network study in Jawadhu Hills
Karthikeyan M & Ramesh S

Abstract

Preserving the local land races is important in the context of biodiversity and food security. Understanding the dynamics of local seed systems- both formal and informal, importance given by the local people to maintain purity of local land races and the seed exchange and network pattern is important to preserve this diversity. This study conducted in Jawadhu hills, Thiruvanamalai District ,one of the project sites of Revalorizing small millets in South Asia (RESMISA), reveals that there prevails a loose informal network in exchange of seeds like Little millet, Finger millet, Pearl millet, Horse gram and other crops. Farmers usually retain their own seeds for next season and rarely exchange. But no precaution is taken by them to ensure the quality and purity of seeds. The nodal farmers who play a crucial role in a normal informal seeds exchange system are absent in this area and exchange occurs between any two persons in this closely knitted community.

Background

Jawadhu hills are an extension of Eastern ghats, located in northern Tamilnadu. There are eleven panchayat villages under Jawadhu Block, which comes under Kalasapakkam taluk of Thiruvannamalai District. DHAN Foundation has been implementing Revalorizing small millets in south asia project in four panchayats in this block, as this block is an important small millet growing area. The Little Millet (samai) is grown predominantly in this area under rainfed conditions, apart from finger millet (ragi) , Horse gram (kollu), Niger( Payellu), Maize (makka cholam) and other crops. Under irrigated conditions paddy is grown as the main crop. The people living here are Malayali tribes to grow Proso millet ( Pani varagu) and Kodo millet (varagu) also before two decade which are not cultivated at present. Even the area under small millets has come down drastically in the last three decades. Local land races of little millet (Samai) , both short and long duration are grown here generation after generation. Samai which once remained as a staple food in their diet got replaced by rice. However people continue to grow samai because it is easy to cultivate, incur less cultivation cost, suitable under rainfed condition and also has a good market value.

The total of physical, organizational and institutional components, their actions and interactions, that determine seed supply and use, in quantitative and qualitative terms at a closely knitted social structure is called the social seed network. Such localized seed systems differ from formal seed systems subjected to legislation and regulation and often the source of new improved varieties) in that these traditional systems have developed naturally over time in response to the demands for seeds among the farming community. Farmers hence have the practise of using their own seeds for cultivation year after year and exchange seeds if there is a need. Also in the present day context they have the opportunity to source new seeds from elsewhere, which if performs well get distributed among the local community through informal means.

The social seed network study was conducted in Jawadhu block to know how the seed distribution takes place among farmers with respect to little millet (samai) and also in other crops.

Social Seed Network

The ways that farmers obtain seed are as old as agriculture, and most small-scale farmers in developing countries routinely save their seed from one harvest to the next. Nowadays, some 60-70 per cent of seed used by these farmers is still saved onfarm. Most of the remaining seed is obtained off-farm, from local sources (Louwaars, 1994; Cromwell, 1996a). Local traditional seed systems are characterized by a low level of organization and institutional development.

They lack formal quality control and are not subject to seed trade regulation. Seed is multiplied without any generation control. Other than from their own farm, farmers usually obtain seed from neighbours or from local traders known to them (H.van Amstel et al,1995). A major factor distinguishing formal and local seed supplies is that the former is vertically organized, whereas the latter system can be considered horizontal. Local seed supply consists of basically the same components: selection, production and diffusion, but contrary to the vertically organized formal systems, organized in a horizontal manner. However, much importance is attached to seed production over the selection and diffusion process. The horizontal pattern of local seed supply systems seems to imply that they are most suitable. Local seed systems are generally considered sustainable because they have operated throughout the 10,000 years before formal seed supply systems emerged in the late 19th century. Unfortunately, Local seed supply systems are slow in responding to changes in ecological or social conditions. A local landrace cannot be adapted to the introduction of chemical fertilizers in only a few generations without the introduction of new genes. Similarly, the genetic variation within landraces may not be large enough to cope with declining soil fertility levels due to pressures on the land. The challenge for developing alternative seed systems is thus to optimize system sustainability (Louwaars,1995).

Local seed supply systems may thus significantly contribute to the conservation of crop genetic resources in farmers’ fields. Though genetic conservation in gene banks has saved a lot of genetic variation (genes and gene complexes) from extinction, it is now accepted that such methods of germplasm conservation are not able to solve the global problem of disappearance of crop genetic diversity. In situ germplasm conservation has received considerable attention recently (Brush 1991; Cooper et al. 1992; Friis-Hansen 1993). However controversies do exit over long-term sustainability of such in situ methods. Thus, sustaining and supporting local seed supply systems is one of the major components of in situ conservation of crop genetic resources.

The seed selection and preservation practices among the farming community tend to vary greatly. While some farmers take at most care in ensuring the quality and purity of seeds, there are also evidences were much attention is not paid for ensuring quality and purity of seeds.

A IFPRI report “ Local Market, Local Varieties” says that liberalization of the Indian seed sector in the 1990s favored dryland cereals and legumes, with little impact on research and formal distribution channels for minor millets. Currently, the states of Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu lead in crop improvement research on minor millets. However, the range of improved varieties is narrow. Private companies show little interest in developing new varieties, due to their lack of commercial importance and the limited scope for developing new hybrids ( Melinda Smale et al, 2009). Seed systems in minor millets are mostly autarkic, farmers depend on their own seeds or other farmers in their community for seed (Latha Nagarajan, 2009) . The studies by the Centre for Indian Knowledge systems in its initiative of Revalorizing rainfed agriculture in Jawadhu hills has observed that in the last decade there has been a decline in diversity of millets grown in the area, while the crops like red, black and green gram lost their importance and not cultivated. Groundnut and gingelly cultivation has decreased by 50%. Livestocks such as cattle, goat and sheep have declined by 10% whereas buffaloes by 90% (CIKS,2012) . The detailed survey done on small millets has led to identification of 30 local varieties of small millets in Jawadhu hills (CIKS,2013). Another survey on uses, constraints and opportunities for small millets by MSSRF in Kolli Hills (Tamil Nadu), hosts a large genetic diversity of nutritious millets, farmers have been conserving about 21 landraces of these three millets for a long time. However the cultivation of these crops had been under increasing threat from tapioca, which was promoted as a cash crop by the local starch industry through a kind of contract farming ( Bhag Mal et al, 2010).

Research Problem

To study the social seed network currently prevailing among tribes of Jawadhu hills with respect to small millets and other crops for ensuring sustainable farming by preservation of land races and supply of quality seeds Objectives of the study

Type and Methodology

The research study was carried out in three selected panchayats of Jawadhu block, Kalasapakkam taluk, Thiruvannamalai district as a part of RESMISA (Revalorizing Small Millets In South Asia) project implemented in this site. A semi structured questionnaire was designed for the study to understand the seed distribution pattern among the farmers, specific seed selection practices if any and the terms under which the seeds get exchanged. The sample size was sixty with twenty samples for each panchayat. Both the random and snow ball sampling techniques were followed. The seed distribution pattern of major crops grown in the area was studied. The focus was more on Little millet Panicum sumatrense ( locally known as Samai) which was the predominant crop in the area followed by other crops like Finger millet Eleusine coracana (locally known as Kevuru) , Niger Guizotia abyssinica (payellu), Paddy Oriza sativa ( Nellu), Maize Zea mays ( makka cholam), Horse gram Macrotyloma uniflorum ( Kollu), Pearl millet Pennisetum glaucum( Cumbu) and other crops.

Panchayat and Villages selected for study



S.No Panchayat Villages coveredNumber of Samples
1 Kuttakarai Kuttakarai
Pattaraikadu
20
2 Nambiyampattu Chinnaveerapattu
Periyaveerapattu
Nambiyampattu
Pattarayan Kudisai
Melkupusanur
Pattanur
20
3 KovillurKovillur
Thombareddi
Perungattur
20
Total 11 60

Outcomes of the study
  1. Little Millet
    • All varieties of Little millet sown are indigenous in nature except for a unknown variety which got introduced by traders and known as IR8 locallly. yy Cittan samai, Perun samai (also known as Vellai samai), Kalman samai and Kolluthanan samai are the local names of Little millet indigenous varieties grown in the area of which Cittan samai is most popular.
    • The Little millet crop is sown in rainfed conditions immediately after rainfall in the month of June-July.
    • The long duration Little millet varieties like Kalman samai and Perunsamai were largely replaced by short duration Cittan samai by the farmers. This is due uncertainty in rainfall and also it facilitates growing of Horse gram and Niger as second crops.
    • Traditionally Little miller crop used to be raised organically and farmers now started using chemical fertilizers due to non-availability of organic manure.
    Preservation of Little millet seeds
    • After harvesting, thrashing, winnowing and cleaning without any stubbles or stones the Little millet seeds are dried under sun for two to five days at the maximum, depending on the temperature and moisture in the seed. After that the seeds are stored in gunny bags and retained in the house.
    • More than 90 % of the farmers do not execute caution to maintain purity of seeds. The same little millet meant for marketing and own consumption is used as seeds.
    • The possibility of admixture of seeds is there if two or more varieties gets thrashed in the same thrashing flour.
    • Each and every farmer retains his own seed for sowing next year. Since farmers sow little millet seedlings year after year without any gap, they usually use their own seeds.
    • Exchange of seeds occur rarely and only for three reasons
      1. if a farmer misses a crop during one year
      2. if a farmer sense admixture of other varieties and
      3. if there is a problem in germination.
    • In Kuttakarai Panchayat, some of the farmers gave up cultivating their land during 2012 and also in 2013. If at all they have to cultivate Little millet in 2014, they have to compulsorily borrow from neighbours, friends and relatives
    • The exchange takes place only in a informal means between neighbours, friends and relatives. No single person could be identified as a nodal farmer during the survey, which is peculiar to the area.
    • The seeds are exchanged only on loan basis. For every kilogram of Little millet a farmer borrows from a neighbour, he has to give back two kilograms after harvest. There is no formal agreement for this and the say of word is sufficient for such exchange.
    • Farmers are satisfied with the existing varieties they cultivate either out of ignorance or out of less importance they give to the crop. However they are willing to try new improved varieties and their response to participatory varietal trial through the RESMISA project implemented in the area is good.
  2. Finger Millet
    • Finger millet is not a predominant crop in the area and yet sown by less than 20 % farmers.
    • Perunkevuru and Muttan keveru are the two popular indigenous varieties of which Muttan Kevuru is widely cultivated.
    • Two of the farmers have cultivated new improved variety of finger millet, Mr.Arichandran Kovillur who sourced it from Mr.Saminathan last year , Vedanthoppu who inturn sourced it from his nephew in Veerapanur five years ago. From the varietal description they gave the variety could be identified as GPU 28, a popular high yielding finger millet variety developed by UAS, Bangalore and widely grown by farmers of Karnataka.
    • The seed exchange pattern in finger millet is same as in the case of little millet and also the preservation practices too are similar with no exclusive care for quality seeds.
  3. Pearl Millet
    • Vella cholam is the local variety grown by majority of the farmers.
    • Few farmers are cultivating a new improved variety the name of which could not be identified since the farmers call it by a different name “ IR-8” locally.
    • The seed exchange mechanism and preservation practices are similar to those of finger and pearl millet.
  4. Paddy
    • The farmers with irrigation source cultivate paddy. Contrast to the case of small millets new improved varieties supplied through agricultural department in Jamunamarathur and sourced from seed shops inn Kalasapaakam and Thiruvannamalai are cultivated by majority of farmers. ADT-43 which is a short duration paddy variety is widely preferred. White ponni is the long duration variety grown. Local varieties like Bhavani which used to be cultivated once are almost extinct.
    • A unknown improved variety sourced from Karanataka the tribal men who went as laborers to a tea estate there is cultivated by few farmers in Nambiyampattu panchayat and because of its good yield and price, the variety gets exchanged among farmers through loan system.
    • Usually farmers retain the paddy seeds for two or three years and later source it from agricultural department or from seed shops to ensure quality. This pattern is different from normal informal means followed in the case of other crops. The reason may be the availability and supply of good quality seeds of paddy through agricultural department and by the seed shops in vicinity.
  5. Horse gram and Niger
    • The horse gram and Niger varieties grown in the area are indigenous in nature. There is only one single variety of horse gram and niger cultivated traditionally by the farmers It is sown in rainfed condition after the little millet crop gets harvested. Usually it is sown along with Niger called Pay ellu locally.
    • The seed exchange and preservation practices are similar to that in the case of little millet.
  6. Other crops
  7. Coleus crop (a medicinal tuber crop) and Cotton ( for hybrid seed production) are the two new crops introduced in the area as contract farming. The seeds are supplied by the private players who provide technical assistance and also buy back the product.

Inference from the study

The local seed system prevailing in Jawadhu hills is highly informal in nature, the exchange of major crops grown in the area occurring rarely that too between neighbours, friends and relatives. Most of the little millet and finger millet varieties are indigenous in nature with their unique characteristic feature. Yet, since the farmers exert less concern with respect to maintaining the purity of such varieties, there is a risk of these varieties losing their individuality in long run. However a different pattern is observed in case of paddy crop, where the farmer’s source seeds of improved varieties from formal sources. With respect to paddy both informal and formal means of seed exchange occurs.

Another interesting feature is even in the informal system, no single farmer could be identified as a nodal farmer. The seed network structure is as such very loose and in fact there no formal network structure exists. The reason is the farmers retain their own seeds for sowing in the next season and rarely exchange.

The farmer’s treat the farm output for consumption/ trade and for seeds equally with no special attention to maintain purity. Lot of awareness and trainings are needed to these farmers to make them understand the genetic diversity of the local land races and to maintain their purity in the context of preserving biodiversity of small millets and thereby ensuring future food security. The local land races of small millets identified should also be subjected to scientific analysis to characterize them and those which excel in their performance and productivity can be introduced to other areas through participatory varietal trial.

If proper intervention is not done to preserve the purity of local land races in Jawadhu, imminent threat is there to the diversity of millets grown in the area.

Development Matters Categories DHAN Foundation
Development Matters